Blog > High Mortgage Rates vs. Home Prices: Who Really Pays the Price?
High Mortgage Rates vs. Home Prices: Who Really Pays the Price?
There is no question that buyers would rather have a 3% mortgage than a 7% mortgage. I would too.
But I think we sometimes look at interest rates in isolation and miss what they actually do to the housing market.
A higher interest rate doesn't just make a house more expensive for the buyer. Eventually, it limits what buyers can pay for the house in the first place.
And that means, in the long run, sellers may be the ones who absorb much of the impact of higher rates through slower appreciation, price reductions, concessions and lower selling prices than they otherwise could have received.
Let’s do some math using Portage, Michigan.
What Happened to One Specific Type of Portage Home?
I ran an actual search for a pretty specific house:
-
Portage, Michigan
-
3 bedrooms
-
2–3 bathrooms
-
More than 1,800 square feet
-
Built between 2000 and 2010
These aren't starter homes from the 1950s or houses needing major renovation. We're looking at relatively modern homes that a lot of move-up buyers would consider.
Here is what happened to the sale prices in my search:
| Year | Average Sale Price |
|---|---|
| 2018 | $230,000 |
| 2019 | $238,000 |
| 2020 | $263,000 |
| 2021 | $300,000 |
| 2022 | $330,000 |
| 2023 | $348,000 |
| 2024 | $348,000 |
| 2025 | $361,000 |
| 2026 YTD | $380,000 |
There is another important part of that story.
In 2023, only four homes meeting those criteria sold.
In 2024, again, only four sold.
In 2025, only three sold.
And so far in 2026, only two have sold.
So while prices haven't collapsed, the number of transactions has.
That distinction matters.
Remember 2.6% Mortgage Rates?
In January 2021, a 30-year mortgage rate around 2.6% really was a thing. Freddie Mac recorded the national average 30-year fixed mortgage rate at 2.65% in early January 2021.
Take our approximately $300,000 Portage house.
A $300,000, 30-year mortgage at 2.65% would have had principal and interest of about $1,209 per month.
With a 15% down payment, the loan would have been $255,000 and the principal-and-interest payment would have been only about $1,028 per month.
Mortgage insurance, taxes and homeowners insurance would then need to be added depending on the loan and property.
That incredibly cheap money gave buyers tremendous purchasing power.
And what happens when a large number of buyers suddenly have more purchasing power while they're competing for a limited number of houses?
They bid prices higher.
That's exactly what you can see in these numbers.
The same general category of Portage home went from approximately:
$230,000 in 2018
to $238,000 in 2019
to $263,000 in 2020
to $300,000 in 2021
to $330,000 in 2022.
Mortgage rates weren't the only reason. Population changes, employment, household formation, construction costs, limited inventory and changing buyer preferences all matter.
But cheap money was an enormous accelerant.
What If These Homes Had Simply Followed Inflation?
Before the biggest run-up, the homes in this search were roughly in the mid-$200,000s.
Let's use $245,000 as a simple baseline.
If a $245,000 house appreciated at 4% per year for eight years, it would be worth about $335,000 today.
Not $380,000.
I'm not suggesting housing prices should track inflation perfectly. They don't. Real estate is local, supply matters tremendously, and individual homes appreciate at different rates.
But it gives us a useful benchmark.
It suggests that at least some of the extraordinary increase we saw wasn't simply normal inflation.
Some of it was created by an unusual period in which buyers had access to historically cheap mortgage money.
What I'm Calling a "Bubble Deflation"
This is where I use a term that isn't meant to be technical economic jargon.
I call what we're experiencing a bubble deflation rather than a bubble pop.
When people hear "housing bubble," they immediately think about 2008: foreclosures, distressed sales, homeowners underwater and people losing their houses.
That isn't what I'm seeing in Portage.
Instead, we're seeing something much slower.
Sellers list high.
The house sits.
The price gets reduced.
Maybe it gets reduced again.
A buyer eventually comes along at a number the market can support.
Or the seller simply decides not to move.
That's a much less destructive way for an overheated market to rebalance.
Prices don't necessarily crash.
Instead, inflation, wage growth and time slowly catch up while appreciation slows and unrealistic asking prices get trimmed.
That's what I mean by bubble deflation.
And Then There's the Mortgage "Lock-In" Effect
Right now, in my same Portage search for a 3-bedroom, 2–3 bathroom home over 1,800 square feet built between 2000 and 2010, there is only one active listing, currently priced around $394,000.
Where did all those houses go?
They didn't disappear.
A lot of the people who own them simply aren't selling.
And why would they?
Someone sitting in a beautiful Portage house with a 2.75%, 3% or 3.5% mortgage may have to replace that loan with a mortgage approaching 7% if they move.
Freddie Mac has studied exactly this phenomenon and calls it the mortgage rate lock-in effect. Homeowners with extremely low fixed rates have a significant financial incentive to stay where they are, which in turn reduces the number of homes coming onto the market.
That helps explain something that otherwise seems contradictory:
High mortgage rates are hurting affordability, but home prices haven't crashed.
Why?
Because high rates aren't just reducing demand.
They're also reducing supply.
The Fed Matters — But It Doesn't Set Your Mortgage Rate
You'll sometimes hear people say that the Federal Reserve "sets mortgage rates."
That's not technically correct.
The Fed directly controls certain short-term interest rates and influences broader financial conditions. Those actions can affect longer-term interest rates, credit conditions and ultimately mortgage rates, but the market determines actual mortgage pricing.
What the Fed absolutely can influence is the environment in which buyers and sellers make decisions.
When borrowing becomes dramatically cheaper, buyers can qualify for larger loans.
That additional buying power can flow into home prices.
When borrowing becomes dramatically more expensive, the opposite happens.
Buyers hit an affordability ceiling.
And once buyers hit that ceiling, sellers cannot simply wish that ceiling away.
Now Let's Look at What the Typical Portage Household Can Afford
The Census Bureau currently puts Portage's median household income at approximately $83,212 per year, or about $6,934 per month.
Let's use 25% of gross household income as a conservative housing-budget benchmark.
That's approximately:
$1,734 per month.
Now let's use approximately:
-
$458 per month for property taxes
-
$80 per month for homeowners insurance
That consumes $538 of the housing budget before we make a single mortgage payment.
That leaves approximately:
$1,196 per month for principal and interest.
At a 7% interest rate, $1,196 per month supports a mortgage of roughly $180,000.
If the buyer puts 15% down, that translates into a purchase price of approximately:
$211,000.
And at the time I ran this search, there were no stick-built homes listed in Portage under roughly that amount.
That's the affordability problem in one sentence.
The income says one thing.
The available housing stock says another.
Something has to give.
Now Compare That With a $310,000 Home
Let's use a current median sale price of approximately $310,000.
Put 15% down:
Purchase price: $310,000
Down payment: $46,500
Mortgage: $263,500
At 7%, principal and interest are approximately:
$1,753 per month.
Add our estimated $538 for property taxes and insurance:
$2,291 per month.
That's approximately 33% of the median Portage household's gross monthly income before utilities, repairs, maintenance, HOA fees or potential mortgage insurance.
And this is where I think people misunderstand housing prices.
The price of a house isn't simply based on what a seller hopes to get.
Ultimately, it has to intersect with what the pool of qualified buyers can actually afford.
This Is Where High Interest Rates Start Working Against Sellers
Let's say sellers collectively want $350,000 for houses that the typical buyer can only finance comfortably at $300,000.
What happens?
At first, nothing.
The seller waits.
Then showings slow.
Then the house sits for 30 days.
Then 60 days.
Then comes the $10,000 reduction.
Then maybe another reduction.
Then the seller offers closing-cost assistance.
Maybe they offer money toward a rate buydown.
Eventually the seller either accepts what the market will support or removes the house from the market.
That is how higher rates work their way into home prices.
The buyer feels the pain immediately in the monthly payment.
The seller feels it more slowly in the price the market is willing to pay.
That's why I say higher rates can eventually become something of a wash.
Not a perfect wash. And certainly not immediately.
But a buyer purchasing a house at a lower price because rates are high permanently establishes that lower purchase price.
If mortgage rates fall later, that buyer may have an opportunity to refinance.
The seller doesn't get to come back five years later and say, "Rates dropped, so I'd like another $30,000 for the house I sold you."
The negotiated purchase price is permanent.
The interest rate potentially isn't.
That doesn't mean anyone should buy a house assuming they will be able to refinance. Rates could stay high for years.
But it does change the way I look at the relationship between rates and prices.
Low Rates Aren't Free Money
Everybody loves low mortgage rates.
So do I.
But there is another side to them.
If everybody's purchasing power suddenly increases at the same time and the number of houses doesn't increase with it, buyers use that extra purchasing power to compete against each other.
The benefit of the lower rate can eventually become capitalized into a higher purchase price.
In other words:
The bank charges you less for the money, but the seller may end up getting more for the house.
Raise rates and the process begins moving in the opposite direction.
The bank charges more for the money, but buyers can no longer support the same price increases.
Eventually sellers have to adjust.
Look at Mortgage Rates Right Now
Freddie Mac's September 10, 2026 survey put the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate at 6.76%.
Compare that with 2.65% in January 2021.
That's an enormous difference.
It helps explain why transaction volume in certain parts of our local market has practically disappeared.
The buyers don't like today's rates.
But neither do the sellers who would have to give up their old rates.
So both sides freeze.
Who Ultimately Pays for Higher Rates?
The easy answer is "the buyer."
And in the short term, that's absolutely how it feels.
The buyer sees the mortgage payment every month.
But zoom out.
Higher rates put pressure on:
-
Buyer purchasing power
-
Home-price appreciation
-
Seller expectations
-
Days on market
-
Price reductions
-
Seller concessions
-
Transaction volume
The cost gets distributed throughout the market.
A homeowner who might have sold for $400,000 in a 4% mortgage environment may discover that buyers at 7% can only support $360,000.
That $40,000 doesn't show up on a bank statement as an "interest-rate expense."
But economically, the seller still absorbed the difference.
That's what I mean when I say sellers ultimately pay part of the price for higher interest rates.
The Market Eventually Has to Meet the Buyer
At the time of my broader Portage search, the median sale price was around $310,000 while average asking prices remained considerably higher.
That's why buyers are seeing price reductions in their home-search emails.
The market isn't necessarily collapsing.
It's negotiating with affordability.
Sellers are still thinking about what their neighbor received in 2021 or 2022.
Buyers are thinking about what today's payment will be at nearly 7%.
Eventually those two numbers have to meet.
And they always do.
Maybe incomes rise.
Maybe mortgage rates fall.
Maybe prices fall.
Maybe some combination of all three happens.
But housing cannot permanently separate itself from the ability of the people living in a community to pay for it.
So Are High Interest Rates Good?
I wouldn't go that far.
I'd love lower mortgage rates.
I'd also love to win the lottery.
Both would make life easier.
But there is a reason extremely cheap money can create problems just as extremely expensive money can.
Neither extreme is particularly healthy indefinitely.
What I think we're watching right now is the housing market slowly trying to find its equilibrium after one of the strangest periods we've ever experienced.
We had historically low mortgage rates.
Prices exploded.
Then rates rose dramatically.
Instead of home prices collapsing, homeowners with low-rate mortgages largely stayed put.
Inventory tightened.
Sales volume dropped.
And now affordability is slowly applying pressure to prices from underneath.
That's why I don't see today's higher rates as simply "buyers losing."
They're part of a much bigger equation.
Low rates allow buyers to pay more.
High rates force buyers to pay less.
And eventually, the seller has to meet the buyer where the math works.
That's not a prediction that Portage home prices are going to crash.
It's actually almost the opposite.
It's why I think we're seeing more of a housing-market deflation than a housing-market pop—a slow adjustment in prices, expectations and affordability rather than widespread distress.
And for the health of the housing market, that's a much better scenario.
The local sales and active-listing figures discussed above are based on my MLS searches at the time of writing and can change as new properties are listed and sold.


